How pathetic that anti-Corona groups DESPERATELY
want to make IDIOTS out of us again with the supposed 82 dollar accounts of
Chief Justice Renato Corona allegedly containing $10 million or more!
First: If he indeed has millions of
dollars in dirty money, Corona
is NOT STUPID to hide it in his name and in 82 bank accounts.
Why would he leave any paper trail or
evidence and risk criminal prosecution?
Second: Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales
admitted that she can’t authenticate the documents given her by the Anti-Money
Laundering Council (AMLC) on the alleged $10 million or more of Corona .
Morales also admitted that NO
VERIFICATION whatsoever was made by her office on the truth and accuracy of the
documents’ contents.
Therefore, everything she said about the
contents was ONLY HER CONCLUSION OR INTERPRETATION, and NOT FACTS or
ESTABLSIJED TRUTH.
Third: Morales did not present the person
who prepared the documents, or any AMLC
official who can declare, under oath, that these are certified true
copies and the contents are true.
That leaves her as the ONLY ONE who says
the documents are genuine and accurate. As I’ve written in my preceding blog,
Morales’ word IS NOT GOSPEL TRUTH!
Let me also repeat that Morales admitted
that the AMLC documents were only ELECTRONICALLY-GENERATED copies from the
agency’s databank.
Don’t forget the LIE of the prosecution
on Corona ’s
alleged 45 properties, which all came from electronically-generated listings
from the databank of the Land Registration Authority.
From 45, the prosecution reduced the
number of properties to 21, and still decreasing.
But despite these deficiencies, anti-Corona
factions are already conditioning the public mind through media that the AMLC
documents and the contents are genuine and correct.
Chief prosecution spokesman Rep. Miro
Quimbo of Marikina ,
said Morales’ statements cannot be classified as hearsay because they were
based on a
Prosecution spokesman and Quezon Rep.
Erin TaƱada said as far as they’re concerned, Corona owns the millions of dollars testified
to by Morales.
Speaker Feliciano Belmonte Jr. and House
Majority Leader Neptali Gonzales II said due to Morales’ testimony, the “end
game” of the impeachment trial is near.
In an obvious attempt to condition the
public mind, Gonzales added that “because of the Ombudsman’s revelation, it
will be extremely difficult for any senator to acquit him (Corona ).
Kung hindi PAKAPALAN NG MUKHA at
WALANGHIYAAN ang tawag dito, I wil welcome more appropriate adjectives.
Just keep this in mind: Anyone who
believes in UNVERIFIED ALLEGATIONS is WORSE than the LIAR and the RUMOR-MONGER!
***
From
our friends:
MORALES
TOTAL FAILURE TO PROVE CORONA
$10M!
JIMMY
PRESTO
A word of advise to Morales: Make sure your
brain is engaged and in gear before speaking.
JONEL ACE ESPERANCILLA
LIES, LIES ,LIES and a lot more lies COMING
OUR WAY!
CONDESA DE ESPANA
If we were in the medieval period, that bitch
could have been executed by fire…as a witchy bitch!
JOSE
LUIS LEGARDA
The only thing that Morales really did was to
sow worry and concern about how her awesome power can be abused and used by
this vindictive admin. Ang kapal my mukha ni Morales na hindi siya magpapagamit
kay Abnoy, when she admitted that she is already working on another impeachment
complaint using her awesome powers.
PATRICIA ILAGAN
Cuevas: We disclothed the Ombudsman. We are
happy.
ANN RUM
Boyet Antonio thanks for sharing. Same
observation. Mukhang di alam ni Conchita mga pinagsasabi niya.
ROCKY TADILI of Marikina Coty
The LESS-MORAL RESORTS TO CON.cheat.
JOEY DEVELA
Morales’ word IS NOT AUTOMATICALLY GOSPEL
TRUTH! Pero wala ba kayong napapansin? Tuwing kukwestiyonin ni Justice Cuevas
si ombudsman, palaging may tanong si Sen. Enrile kung kinukwestyon niya
credibility ni ombudsman.
ADIA RODRIGUEZ RUBIANO
Boyet, grabe si Morales.
REY CORONA
of Tanauan, Batangas
She's just assuming na accurate ang binigay
sa kanya ng AMLC.. What kind of Ombudsman is this? Tamad magverify ng
information.
GRACE GO of Manila
Parang asong naulol na sunod-sunoran sa utos
ng amo niyang BALIW.
DOMINGO RAMOS
That is according to "Danger Signs"
and you!
NES TRINIDAD
Hi, Boyet! Morales
may not have proven her case but she just did major, major damage to the CJ's
case. Allow me to explain. This is one of the legal tricks employed by lawyers
for jury trial - they mention a half truth but with the implication that the accused may or may not have done something
illegal, therefore a seed is planted that the accused is less than honorable. This
somehow sticks to the minds of the jurors and may work against the accused in
the deliberations. In this particular case, she did a lot of damage in the
court of public opinion. God knows there are so many financial scandals that
have hit our financial systems wherein the money trail went cold. The Defense
team led by the Old Fox Cuevas now face an even bigger obstacle than before -
how do you go up against a ghost?... The only way out here is to EXPOSE THE
CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE CJ AND PROVE THE MASTERMIND IS THE CURRENT RESIDENT OF
THE PALACE BY RIVER. Easier said than done. Otherwise, even if the CJ gets
acquitted by the Impeachment court, it will be a phyrric victory - he may have
to resign to avoid damaging the institution he loves and has honorably served.
I just hope Morales and her cohorts get their comeuppance in this life or the
next.
IROSELYN DONEZA
If there’s smoke, there’s fire!
XOXOMYSTICA GO
She accepted it hook, line and sinker.
BITUINMORY VILANUEVA
She's liable, kasi nilabag
niya ang secrecy law on foreign currency.
MORALES’ TESTIMONY DID NOT PROVE ANYTHING!
BING DELOS SANTOS
Hi Boyet A PACK of
LIES done by APACK of WOLVES DRESSED in OmBADsman
gear, Moraless the leader! Geesh, watching her yesterday made me puke! IF
ONLY... !
ED PUNZAL of Tagig
C;mon…meaningless?
FREDERICK AGBAYANI
Well, it proved that
she is as rotten as hell as well. I pity her actually. At her age, where she can leave a lasting legacy to her
country, she chose to be a paid puppet. What a shame.
MICHAEL
EUPERIO
Bear in mind that the
testimony wasn't for legal purposes but for propaganda,. You all have to admit
that there was large media mileage with this event.
CASIANO MAYOR
There were dates and
amounts of withdrawals. Why don't you let the chips fall where they should. Why
do you have to dismiss her words outright instead of letting investigation go
further? Fanaticism doesn't square well with reason.30
No comments:
Post a Comment
EVERYBODY IS WELCOME TO EXPRESS THEIR OWN OPINION ON THE ISSUE. But we discourage use of FOUL words.
Please be reminded that this blog is under COMMENT MODERATION, all comments will be reviewed before publishing. We have the right to reject any insolent comment.