The prosecution and their allies in trying to destroy Chief
Justice Renato Corona are now desperately trying to CONDITION THE PUBLIC MIND
that he should be convicted by flooding news websites with posts supportive of
their view.
So as I’ve said in my preceding blog, before you fall into their
trap, consider th following:
First: Any discrepancy in one’s statement of assets, liabilities
and net worth (SALN) is NOT AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE.
If I remember correctly, Senator-Judge Joker Arroyo himself pointed
that out early on in the impeachment trial.
Second: Corona
did not declare his P80-million peso savings accounts, yes, because the funds
were from OTHER PEOPLE’S MONIES.
Keep in mind guys, he even gave a breakdown as proof: P34.7 million from the sale of the Basa
Guidote Enterprise Inc. property to the city government of Manila (which, he
emphasized, is still INTACT), P10 million from its earnings; P15 million from
his daughter, Charina; P4 million from his daughter, Carla, P2 million from his
son, Francis and some P6.8 million in interests from the Bank of the Philippine
Islands.
The existence of the Basa Guidote money had been proven earlier in
the trial. So had the financial capacity of Charina, a LICENSED physical
therapist in the US .
Now, ONLY A THIEF would declare something as his own but is
actually not, or if it was only entrusted to him or her. PIso manalo iang
milyon, KAHIT ISA sa prosecution, walang gagawa nito.
The prosecution and their anti-Corona cohorts are now trying to
flood the Internet with comments that the Chief Justice should have declared
his dollar accounts based on the law on SALN.
Anybody correct me if I’m wrong, since I’m not a lawyer, but there
is no jurisprudence which says that the SALN law is superior over RA 6426.
But, and whether or not his detractors will agree, Corona showed EXEMPLARY
GOOD FAITH when he submitted his waiver on his dollar and peso accounts to the
impeachment court UNCONDITIONALLY.
In the process, suggesting that the managers of the banks holding
his monies be summoned by the impeachment court, indirectly saying he has nothing
to hide.
With Corona
himself having explained his side, there’s only one thing left for anyone to
do:
Evaluate the case OBJECTIVELY AND FAIRLY.
Base your assessment on what the defense and the prosecution had
presented as evidence. Listen to BOTH SIDES, not just to one, and appreciate
only the proof which had been established as the truth or correct in the trial.
Keep in mind, people, the prosecution and their gangmates are NOT
THE ONES who will decide on Corona ;s
fate. It’s the MAJORITY of the Senate
Impeachment Court .
HINDI
PORKE MAS MARAMI ang lumalabas, at lalabas, sa media mula sa prosecution o mga
kakampi nila ay iyon na ang tutoo o tama!
***
From our friends:
BEFORE DRILON FOOLS ANYBODY…
PRIMO CRISOSTOMO of Farmville , Virginia ,
USA
This DRILON thinks he is a SACRED COW... he
is NOTHING but a SCARED PIG.
CATHERINE LOPEZ
Tama po kayo. Hindi dapat magpaloko kay
Drilon.
MELCHOR VERGARA
H-A-Y-O-P talaga si Drilon - Hypocrite
Asshole, Yellow Obese Pig.
PAULA KNACK
Ayaw nga mag-sign ng
waiver. Siguro, malaki ang tinatago. Isang bahay na malaki, binigay lang sa
inaanak !
MARIANN MARASIGAN
Mabubuking ata!
BETH BUSAING
Si Drilon, from
Marcos to Aquino, spanning how many presidents? Think about it.
AIDA RODRIGUEZ
RUBIANO
Only a fool can be
fooled by that pig!
CHICKOI CRUZ
He is the plague!
ROMEO CASTRO of Manila
Drillon and the 188
congressmen, accept the CJ's invitation to sign a waiver along with him for the
interest of the Filipino people and for transparency and accountability. What
is there be scared of in signing the waiver?
ARMANDO MACAAREM of Laoag City ,
Ilocos Norte
It shows that he is also hiding something....if
he is clean as he said, then it is just right for him to accept the challenge
to vindicate his name.
CONDESA DE ESPANA
Takot sila na mabulgar kung paano nakabili ng
mansion sina BABOY DRILON sa Forbes Park......at si NAIL THAT TUPAS sa Xavierville,
mula nang naupo si Abnoy!
GELO MALLARI
Supilin ang mga kampon ng kadillawan...isa na
si Sen. Trapo Baboy Drilon. Wala naman nagawa iyan. Magaling lang yan sa papogi.
Kaya ayaw niya kumasa sa hamon ni CJ, siguro maraming ill-gotten wealth iyan.
JAY RON DE CASTRO of Lemery, Batangas
Kung totoong wala silang tinatago,I papakita
nila lahat ng kanilang bank account. Bakit ba hindi sila gumawa ng batas na
kapag gov’t employee ka, open to the public lahat ng SALN mo, pati bank account
and hidden job!
PETER OBANN
The Ombudsman can verify Drilon's SALN. His
case is different from that of Corona ..
Corona never
mentioned any dollar equivalent assets in his SALN. Drilon did. It is true that
there is a banking secrecy law. but as filed in his SALN, he gave the waiver
for the ombudsman to verify these facts. What Corona is doing is saving his ass.. He wasn't
there to insinuate that Drilon has hidden dollars, but to prove his concept
that if they will not sign their waiver, then it must be true that his
interpretation of the law that dollar accounts are absolutely confidential and that
he has the right not to divulge them in his SALN.
The impeachment court is a trial no other than the trial of Renato Corona, no more, no less.
The impeachment court is a trial no other than the trial of Renato Corona, no more, no less.
OL2GEDER
Focus was shifted to other government
officials, therefore a distraction to the proceedings. Does it mean that if all
these accusers are guilty of same the offense as CJ, he will be acquitted? C’mon,
eyes on the ball please.
ANONYMOUS
If they won’t sign, the waiver, that means the fingers
pointing to the CJ are dirtier!
CRESCENT
Exactly. But more importantly, can Noynoy and
the rest of his family sacrifice portions of Hacienda Luisita for the benefit
of landless farmers? I am not a fan of Corona
but I have more respect for someone like him than those who pretend to rule
this country with justice and honor.
FROM READERS WHO ASKED NOT TO BE NAMED
Baka kumidlat pag si Frank Drilon at 188 congressmen na ang
pumirma ng waiver.
I most definitely agree. If these 188 congressmen
and Sen. Drilon have got nothing to hide, then what's holding them back? I
heard Rep. Erin Tanada say earlier in an interview that he does not see the
need for him to sign the waiver because he is not the one being tried. Rep.
Bolet Banal even said that including Sen. Drilon is a big insult to the man. Hearing
this from them makes me think that Sen. Miriam Defensor Santiago was indeed
right in calling them G*GO, even If I am not a lawyer and I only have limited
knowledge of our Constitution. If I were in CJ's shoes, I'd do the same thing
and dare them to bare all for the people to see. Why would I single out myself
in disclosing everything when not a single one of my accusers doesn't even have
the guts to stand up to the challenge and disclose everything he has, similar
to that of what they are asking me to disclose? By this, we can prove to everyone
who among all of us is telling a lie. The line of reasoning they are using is
very pathetic. They always say that "If the Chief Justice has nothing to
hide, then why not disclose it?" Now I ask them, if you, too. don't have
anything to hide, then why not disclose yours? Most of these CongressMEN are males.
It's time to see who is the real MAN!
I fully agree.
Kalokohan!
NO SANE REASON TO DISRESPECT IMPEACH COURT
JOE ALVARADO JR. of Makati
Diversionary tactic, squid tactics whatever
tics. The188 congressmen and Drilon must accept the challenge.
ANONYMOUS
I am personally sad over this latest
development. I don't believe that the prosecution's case is really that strong
to warrant a conviction but I can now see that Corona would soon be nailed on the cross made
by Malacanang. My impression is that CJ Renato Corona lost the battle by his
action.
UNSEEN HANDS BEHIND KEH’S ACTION!
ANONYMOUS
Abnoy is the wind beneath the wings of Harvey Keh-nkoy.30
No comments:
Post a Comment
EVERYBODY IS WELCOME TO EXPRESS THEIR OWN OPINION ON THE ISSUE. But we discourage use of FOUL words.
Please be reminded that this blog is under COMMENT MODERATION, all comments will be reviewed before publishing. We have the right to reject any insolent comment.