I found six questionable points in the latest Social Weather Stations (SWS) survey saying that seven out of 10 Filipinos are satisfied with Pnoy’s performance.
The survey was done in the fourth quarter of 2011, long before the start of the impeachment trial of Chief Justice Renato Corona.
The survey was released at a time when rallies and expressions of support for Corona consistently showed that Pnoy’s supposed popularity was not enough to sway majority public opinion to Pnoy’s vocal desire to oust Corona.
Apart from these, some of the survey results are highly doubtful.
For example, the survey said Pnoy;s government earned ‘very good’ ratings in helping the poor. But an earlier survey, also by SWS if I remember right, showed that the incidence of hunger had increased.
How do you reconcile that?
The survey gave ‘good’ ratings to Pnoy’s government in promoting the welfare of overseas Filipino workers (OFW).
But there has been no report on what and how much help, if any, has been given to OFWs who were forced to go home due to unrest in their place of work.
As what we had all seen in media, the Pnoy government practically goes through the proverbial ‘eye of the needle’ in getting OFWs out of troubled countries.
‘Good’ ratings were also given to Pnoy’s administration in developing tourism,
I haven’t heard of any major tourism development program by the Pnoy government since it took office – no rehabilitation, renovation or massive promotion of tourist spots, no perks or incentives for tourists, no nothing.
Anybody correct me if I’m wrong.
The survey results were printed practically in its entirety in the leading newspapers. But the ONLY REACTION included was that of Malacanang. No comments were generated from any neutral group or personality, or those critical of the Aquino Administration.
And as usual, the survey results were PURELY NUMBERS.
The AREAS SURVEYED were not cited. There were no specific details to support the purported good and very good ratings. In other words, NOTHING TO PROVE OR JUSTIFY the results.
You have the floor, people!
***
From the readers:
PSBANK MANAGER SAYS CORONA RECORDS FAKE!
MARIA DOLORES SANTOS of London , United Kingdom
Punong-puno ng pagmamaniobra ang pagtitiwalag na ito at TUNAY
na nakakasawa na...mga matatalino nga ngunit pilit na pinaiikot ang batas at isang damakmak na mga sinungaling.
na nakakasawa na...mga matatalino nga ngunit pilit na pinaiikot ang batas at isang damakmak na mga sinungaling.
LETTY ARCILLA
Ano ba yan, binababoy ng prosecution panel ang trial at binabastos ang mga senator-judges. Walang katotohanan lahat ang inihain na reklamo at lahat ng ebidensiya ay peke!
PEACH ZARI of Caloocan City
Lahat na yata ng nega, matatawag na sa kanila: arogante, sinungaling,, nagbu-bully, manloloko, etc.
LENI RACCA
Both sides are in hot water!
RODEL BANARES pf Marikina City
The prosecution obviously knew the docs were fake -- they're just too arrogant to think they won't get caught. The trial this afternoon will be exciting, to say the least. Can I place this blog in the Sentinel newsletter mockup I'm making?
DELI FRANCE
Paanong maging fake, naisubmit na some bank documents as attachment after confirmation by no less than PSBank president
ABDUL RAJEED MANAIN
Deli France , tanong mo kay Tiongson. Siya kasi ang may sabi.
ALON VALDEZ
Si Tupas daw, mas magaling tumingin ng fake bank records kaysa sa PSBank manager.
MANIMOGS
I believe the bank manager was trying to save her job, as well as the reputation and credibility of PSBank and the entire banking industry. If she admitted there was a leak, she would certainly face an avalanche of legal problems and the bank will lose clients. Right from the start, the prosecutors are relying on the popularity of Pnoy as a basis for impeaching Renato Corona. The prosecutors have no game plan, did not prepare, did not research, relied heavily on investigative journalists and were too lazy to gather information. Mag-trabaho naman kayo nang maayos. Maraming may ayaw kay Corona pero kung puro palpal ebidensiya nyo, sinasayang nyo lang oras namin
CHIZ’S STATEMENT BELIES OCHOA DENIAL!
ANONYMOUS
Is he not the same executive secretary who was hopelessly drunk and cavorting with an actress at a hotel lobby while the Luneta hostage crisis was going on? And does this person Ochoa expect us to believe his denial? What is his credibility? 30
No comments:
Post a Comment
EVERYBODY IS WELCOME TO EXPRESS THEIR OWN OPINION ON THE ISSUE. But we discourage use of FOUL words.
Please be reminded that this blog is under COMMENT MODERATION, all comments will be reviewed before publishing. We have the right to reject any insolent comment.