Tuesday, May 15, 2012
MORALES TOTAL FAILURE TO PROVE CORONA $10M!
Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales was TOTAL FAILUIRE in proving the supposed $10 million owned and undeclared by Chief Justice Renato Corona when she continued her testimony in the Senate Impeachment Court.
Morales did not even succeed in establishing with certainty Corona’s ownership of the supposed 82 dollar accounts.
Morales categorically admitted that she RELIED ENTIRELY on her presumption that documents furnished her by the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) are correct and accurate.
She admitted that:
No verification whatsoever was made by her office from the banks whom she had claimed were holding Corona’s dollar accounts.
She WOULD NOT EVEN KNOW the nature of the accounts – savings, current -- she had cited in her power point presentation.
She could NOT BE SURE which of the supposed 82 accounts were still l existing.
She’s not privy into how the AMLC came up with and prepared the documents furnished to her. In effect, she would not know whether or not the AMLC produced the document in total accordance with the law.
In other words, Morales only had her word and the AMLC document as proof of Corona’s supposed $10 million.
But as I was writing this piece, guys, ABS-CBN’S ANC Channel announced that there were circulating reports that AMLC boss Vic Aquino was disowning some portions of the documents furnished to Morales.
So WHERE IS THE PROOF that Corona indeed owns $10 million in 82 bank accounts?
Morales’ word IS NOT AUTOMATICALLY GOSPEL TRUTH!
From our friends:
MORALES’ TESTIMONY DID NOT PROVE ANYTHING!
GRACE GO of Manila
Another basura!! Sigurado ngayon takot na takot na sila kasi alam na ng sambayanan na puro kasinungalingan lahat at fake ang documents na naman nila!
NEIL GABION of Quezon City
It's funny how they make the impeachment court a mockery.
LERMA MIJARES of Quezon City
lIt actually proved that government forces are conspiring against the CJ, even to the extent of breaking several laws along the way. Conchita kept invoking Sec 22 of the Ombudsman Law, when she failed to read Sec 21 first.
I agree, Boyet. It only proved she can read words from a Powerpoint presentation and that it can have colors.
t proved that Conchita Morales should have married a Mura-more instead of a Mora-less so her name can represent her!
ROMEO UY of North Las Vegas , Nevada
I hope that these are all nightmares.
Ano naman ang maipruprove niya eh puro hearsay/allegations/accusation/tsismis at walang ebidensiya. ONLI IN DA OMBUDSMAN! Sa korte nga, kahit may namatay, kung walang complainant/witness/evidence ito ay di magproprosper!
Moral-LESS' testimony proves something....that PNoy is out to use all gov’t agencies on his personal vendettas against his perceived political enemies.
PRIMO CRISOSTOMO of Farmville , Virginia , USA
Every word this Ombudsman utters is MORAL-LESS.
Boyet, thank you for doing such a good job.. Just keep going and let all the Filipinos know about the rules of law and the role of justice in democracy. Mabuhay ka.
CONDESA DE ESPANA
My God!, we now have a BIG LIAR as an ombudsman!, a sucker by the name of Conchita iMoral less!......heaven have mercy on her family!
RICKY BELGICA of Montreal , Quebec , Canada
Pnoy, better start working. Be a President of a country. You got a job to do We are paying ALL of you and you guys got nothing better to do but fuck us all up.
JAY-R D MARCHAN of Baguio City
Christmas tree power point presentation ni Morales. The playing field is not fair! Media, high ranking officials are in support of Pnoy!
CRISTY MARIE REYES of Iloilo City
Sabi ko na nga ba, this is another LRA Hoax...82 dollar accounts? So ridiculous!
JOSE LUIS LEGARDA
I will admit that round 1 goes to Morales. But she will have a very big problem in the coming days because of her complicated presentation because it was really designed to demolish.
JOSIE SANTOS-MARQUESES TABLIGAN
Indeed, Boyet, but perhaps it served the 'actual and original' purpose, if you know and share what I mean!
ORANGE POTION of Cebu City
Baka gustong tumakbo sa halalan.
Of course, not. She’s a dumb liar!
Her testimony with that $10M is based on "transactional balance", meaning the running total of what went in and out of those accounts. This is. to say the least, too disingenuous for the Ombudsman nor the COA to offer as evidence. Why didn't they present the final or closing balance as the real money obtainable/ That is a puzzling thought for me. And to belie her testimony, her presentation was based on the electronic data gathered from AMLC's database. Anybody with knowledge of SQL or any database handling software can do ‘miracles’ to fudge the results. This is what is worrisome as figures doled out in the impeachment court could cloud the senator-judges' judgment later, stressing the fact that behind those figures could point out the opposite if based on the original database record. More so, paper or hard copy evidence hasn't been presented nor attached to the report to buttress the truthfulness of the presented documents. Bottom line: no paper trail, invalid document and invalid evidence.
PAULO TIBIE of Cainta, Rizal
This ombudsman is going down just like the 45 properties as a complete lie.
RICKY MATIAS of Omaha , Nebraska , USA
They proved that CJ is more nationalistic, putting all his 82 dollar account in the country unlike the senators/congressman who got accounts abroad, particularly Switzerland and Hong Kong . LOL 30