MORALES' TESTIMONY DID NOT PROVE ANYTHING!

Explosive sounding as it was, Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales DID NOT PROVE ANYTHING when she testified in the Senate Impeachment Court that Chief Justice Renato Corona had $10 million in 82 dollar accounts in five different banks.

Morales presented a power-point presentation of supposed transactions worth thousands of dollars in Corona’s alleged 82 bank accounts.

But take note, ladies and gentlemen:

First: Until the trial adjourned, the figures presented by Morales DID NOT AMOUNT to $10 million.

Second: Morales admitted that she arrived at the $10 million amount BASED ONLY on supposed documents from the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC). Meaning, she had NO PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE of the documents’ contents and WAS NOT PRIVY to the preparation of these.

Third: Morales admitted that the documents were ONLY ELECTRONICALLY-GENERATED copies from the AMLC databank.

Remember the BIG, FAT LIE of the prosecution on Corona’s supposed 45 properties based on computer-generated documents from the Land Registration Authority (LRA) databank, people?

After boasting the supposed 45 properties I media, the prosecution themselves later admitted they had proof ONLY FOR 21.

Fourth: Related to this, the supposed AMLC documents HAVE NOT BEEN AUTHENTICATED by the banks Morales mentioned as certified true copies.

Fifth: Morales said Corona’s supposed 82 dollar accounts started in 2003. But she DID NOT PRESENT PROOF that ALL of these were still active. On the contrary, Morales herself revealed that one of the accounts, a time deposit, was PRE-TERMINATED or CLOSED on the day Corona was impeached last year.

Sixth: Morales FAILED TO PRESENT the beginning or current balances of the supposed 82 dollar accounts to prove that these indeed held $10 million.

What he cited only were movements of funds which, again,did not amount to $10 million

Seventh: Morales did not present documentary evidence that the supposed 82 accounts were indeed all owned by Corona.

In the LRA HOAX, no less than the LRA administrator admitted before the impeachment court that not all of the 45 properties his agency supplied to the prosecution were still owned by Corona.

Eighth: Morales did not have DEPOSIT OR WITHDRAWAL slips or other bank documents for the supposed 82 accounts proving ownership by Corona. The possibility that the supposed AMLC documents were simply manufactured by a computer whiz kid in our out of the agency is very, very high!

Let not anybody be MISLED! 

Morales’ word IS NOT GOSPEL TRUTH! FAIRNESS dictates that Corona’s explanation must be heard first.

As it is, Morales’ testimony was MEANINGLESS!

                                                                        ***

From our friends:

MORALES WILL NEED A MIRACLE…

BIEN BALAJADIA of Marikina

If she squirms out of this, it won't be a miracle. It would be a contract with the devil. i won't be surprised if her head starts burning when she gets out of the sunlight.

JOEMZ ROLZ of San Francisco , Agusan del Sur

Yes, Brother Boyet, absolutely. Tthis is awesome, I agree with you. Putting Mr. Chiief Justice on trial is very irresponsible, the idea of the majoritiy in Congress.

JOSE LUIS LEGARDA

I don’t think miracles are applicable to those who persecute the others. I do not think God will be at the side of the arrogant and selfish.

ISABEL JUICO of Jacksonville , Florida , USA

Miracle? Or apology with remorse? Miracles are granted to those who do GOOD. Her acts do not constitute that, but EVIL

JONEL ACE ESPERANCILLA

Mababasag ang bulaang Kristal niya sa pagkakataong ito!

SYLVIA CENON

Indeed, a miracle is what is needed for both Morales and Benign Aquino. Yes, you are right, Boyet as I have been posting it too that President Abnoy is a very bad example to the Filipino masses. He is like a gangster in running the country so the masses as a whole are also behaving like gangsters.

DELIA SANIDAD

 Today's impeachment trial is a must watch, if only to watch how one's credibility will be shattered just because of basing her $10M folly on media reports. not on hard evidence. But didn’t she use to be an SC justice?

ED PUNZAL of Tagig

Just look at you people, commenting on something which has yet to happen. Why don't you just wait until the Ombudsman takes the witness stand in the trial and then, after which, say your piece to your heart's content.

RICKY MATIAS of Omaha , Nebraska , USA

I think she needs repentance for being an instrument in destroying other people’s lives.

LETTY ARCILLA

Marunong bang magapoligize ang mga sinungaling?

LOLITA BELEN of Cabuyao,Laguna

Sorry to say...God only gives miracles to the one who is righteous! RIGHTEOUS KA BA CARPIO?

BIENVENIDO VALERIO of Quezon City

Ang bobo naman niya.Bakit  sa tabliod siya tumitingin ng ebidensiya?  Parang hindi abugado.

LARD SOLOSA

Today, the Abnoy government doesn't need hard evidence to convict. Morales thinks she can do a Mupas to pin down CJ Corona the same way the Comelec, DOJ and Mupas did to FPGMA.

TITO QUIOGUE

All that Morales has is a "$10million tsismis" as evidence.

MORALES WILL DIG HER OWN GRAVE…

DAN TAMARGO of Stockton , California , USA

This is not public accountability being thrown on a high government official but a personal vendetta by an incompetent and lazy highest leader of the land and He himself should be the one who's accountable and liable for all this nonsense waste of tax payer's money. I just hope that He will face the music at the same venue after his term if not sooner. 30