Thursday, March 1, 2012
A CHALLENGE TO SERENO!
I just don’t know if this is legally possible but here’s a challenge to Supreme Court Associate Justice Ma.
DETAIL the supposed irregularities you had cited in your dissenting opinion on the court’s issuance of a temporary restraining order (TRO) in favor of former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo (GMA) last year UNDER OATH.
Put an emphasis on why didn’t you PUBLICLY REVEAL the supposed irregularities RIGHT AFTER it occurred, considering the gravity and the personality involved.
Either through a press conference or press statement.
Please clarify what was the reaction of the other justices to your opinion, and if you did anything at all to try to convince them to the morality of it.
Did you confront Chief Justice Renato Corona about these supposed irregularities? If yes, what happened? If you did not, why?
Did you inform anybody else, especially President Aquino about these supposed irregularities? If yes, who and what did that person say? If no, why?
You have kept quiet about the supposed irregularities since November of last year. And yet, you now hint of having wanted to testify about it in
’s impeachment trial had the
prosecution not rested its case. Corona
Why the sudden change of heart?
I hope my former colleagues in media would consider doing a story about this.
Based on Sereno’s opinion, Justice Secretary Leila de Lima had testified in the impeachment court that
made it appear
that the Nov. 15 TRO was immediately effective. Corona
This despite the Arroyos’ non-compliance to its three conditions.
But think about these, people:
One of the conditions is that the Arroyos should report to the nearest Philippine consulate or embassy upon arrival in their destination.
So how can the Arroyos do that if they wouldn’t be able to leave?
With the TRO, De Lima said
GMA and her husband in trying to escape prosecution. Corona
But that time, no case had been filed yet against GMA. So there was no prosecution to escape from.
said the TRO was
effective the moment it was issued and the Arroyos only had five days to comply
with its conditions. Corona
Just five days. Otherwise, the TRO would have been lifted. Think about it, guys, before you make your own conclusions.
From the readers:
LIE NO. 4 FROM TUPAS!
RODEL RAMIL of
, Hong Kong Kowlonn
He claimed to the public na the House panel will win, and then sasabihin niya na advocacy lang nila kaya sinasabi naya yun? Misleading ang ginagawa nila sa Impeachment court, lalo na sa publiko.
RICKY MOPN FORT of
The only good thing about Tupac is his dumbness and stupidity cause if he was smart and intelligent, then the CJ will be in trouble now.
FRANCIS DOMINIC LIM
Now, that lawyer is a liar!
He has no more credibility.
EXPECT ALL-OUT BRAINWASHING FROM THE PROSECUTION!
If they have been showing their so-called power from day 1, railroading of impeachment, illegally obtaining those bank documents, etc, expected po iyan. Kanila ang kaban ng bayan. Peace be with you BA.
Dropping five of the eight article of impeachment will not jeopardize the prosecutors’ case. Remember what the presiding officer qouted? This is not a criminal case. Those five articles are not applicable in this trial. This three remaining articles are sufficient enough to meet the requirement of preponderance of evidence.30