Forum

Saturday, May 26, 2012

INSULTING BRAINWASHING BY PROSECUTION!


INIINSULTO na ng impeachment trial prosecutors ang utak ng sambayanan.

The prosecution now says that according to the UNSIGNED AND UNVALIDATED Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) report presented by Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales, Chief Justice Renato Corona withdrew at least $3.25 million from Dec. 12 to Dec. 22, 2011, contrary to his claims that he only had  $2.4 million in deposits.

But up to now, both MORALES and the PROSECUTORS HAVE NOT PRESENTED ANYBODY from the AMLC to PUBLICLY certify that the report was GENUINE and the contents TRUE AND ACCURATE!

Both Morales and the prosecution COULD NOT EVEN IDENTIFY the person who prepared the report. They have not explained why is it UNSIGNED and unauthenticated.

In other words, it’s ONLY the prosecution and Morales who says the contents of the report are true and accurate. NO ONE ELSE.

May kasabihan tayo sa Tagalog: Ang naniniwala sa sabi-sabi, WALANG BAIT SA SARILI.

If anybody will object, just be sure you can show me a law that says the prosecution’s word must be taken hook, line and sinker simply because they’re the prosecution.

In a story you’ll find today in the Philippine Star, the prosecution cited supposed huge dollar withdrawals by Corona from various banks. But they’re only basis is the supposed AMLC report, which, as Morales herself had admitted, WAS NOT VERIFIED BY HER.

NO CONFIRMATION from any one of the banks cited, no categorical statement of accuracy of the figures by anybody from the banks or from the AMLC, NO NOTHING! But they’re feeding it to media, and for that matter the people, as Gospel tru and throwing new accusations against Corona based on it.

And look at this, guys: the supposedly official AMLC report allegedly showed that Corona withdrew  $487,998 on Dec. 19. But it was EITHER a manager’s check or telegraphic transfer.

Alam iyung amount kuno ng withdrawal pero HINDI ALAM in what form. Samantalang supposed to be, reported iyun sa AMLC. Incomplete report, ganun?

Corona also supposedly withdrew $350,000 on Dec. 22 and transmitted the money to an account outside the country. But the prosecution did not say what country. So HOW THE HELL did they know that it was another country in the first place? How did the AMLC know?
The prosecution said an analysis of the AMLC report showed that Corona’s dollars began increasing only in 2004, contrary to his statement that he had been accumulating dollars for the past 35 years.

But they DID NOT GIVE ANY EXPLANATION! 

And remember, people, Corona had suggested to the impeachment court to summon his account officer at Bank of the Philippine Islands if they want to verify his dollar accounts.

Lead prosecutor Rep. Niel Tupas Jr. said the Constitution, which requires government personnel to declare all their wealth in their statement of assets, liabilities and net worth (SALN), should prevail over Republic Act 6426 which exempts them from doing so.

Says who, Mr Tupas, you?  Basis, please!

At tingnan n’yo, mga kababayan, kung GAANO KARUMING LUMABAN si prosecution spokesman Rep. Juan Edgardo Angara.

Angara said Corona was “five years to six years late in including condominium units in Makati and Taguig in his SALN.”

Suddenly, Angara is struck with AMNESIA in forgetting that Corona’s lawyers had presented witnesses who testified that his wife Cristina had complaints about the condominium units that took years to be fixed.

Masyado na tayong GINAGAGO ng prosecution, mga kababayan! Palalampasin n’yo ba ito?
                                                              ***
From our friends:

REMEMBER THESE, UNTIL IMPEACH COURT DECIDES!

ALVIN GATIMONDOC of Cebu City
Bro. Boyet Antonio, mas maganda sana kung di tumindig si CJ at doon lang sa witness stand humingi ng medical assistance!

RONALD TUASON
Kahit magpapresscon pa oras-oras ang prosecution, maliwang na sa taong bayan ang malisyang kinakalat nila. Ang nangyari kanina, ang mga sagot ni CJC ay nagbibigay liwanag sa mga batas na kanyang sinusunod. Thanks, kapatid Boyet Antonio.

GERRY JAVIER JR. of Makati City
I believe Senator Drilon will have his day in court, for conveying to the Chief Justice, " Pag hindi ka nag-resign, huhubaran kita at ang pamilya sa publiko. " How arrogant can a person become once in power! Weather-weather lang yan......Boyet Antonio

JOEY DEVELA
Thanks, bro, for reminding us and we will not forget. But still, we should and must be confident that we won our case  Tayo pong mga Pilipino ang nanalo dito at si CJ Corona lang ang nagdusa para sa ating kapakanan, Isinakripisyo niya ang lahat lahat para sa atin. At ito ang naging dahilan kung bakit higit at lalo siyang napamahal sa ating Panginoon. Bukas ay Pentecost Sunday. Sa mga nangyari so loob ng isang lingo, hindi papayagan ng Espirito Santo na maghari ang kadiliman sa kanyang kaarawan. Kung hindi pa nakikita ng mga senador ang SIGN na ito, patuloy pa natin silang ipagdasal

NES TRINIDAD
As I've posted in another blog we both belong to, it will all boil down to whether the jurors consider these "omissions/mistakes" in the SALN as tantamount to a High Crime like treason, or economic sabotage. If not, was there deception involved that constitutes Betrayal of Public Trust? The answer to both is a big NO, ergo the CJ is NOT GUILTY of all these charges. A blind man can see it.... unless they have been blinded by P100m and other favors.

CASIANO MAYOR
You may be correct in some of your observations, but Corona is definitely an incompetent CJ. Nagkalat sa pagsagot sa second tanong ni Miriam the Grovel at sa many interpretations of basic laws.

REBECCA BADAY
Thank you, Sir Boyet, for sharing this unending political talk. As i was reading...it’s so sad to know that our government is focused on this issue when there are a lot of problems to face.

BEFORE DRILON FOOLS ANYBODY…

SALVIA YAGA
Ba't may taong bulag at bingi sa katotohanan? Kung malinis si Drilon, sign the waiver to open his account. 30

  

No comments:

Post a Comment

EVERYBODY IS WELCOME TO EXPRESS THEIR OWN OPINION ON THE ISSUE. But we discourage use of FOUL words.

Please be reminded that this blog is under COMMENT MODERATION, all comments will be reviewed before publishing. We have the right to reject any insolent comment.